Is scrotal ultrasound scan necessary in patients with clinically suspected benign testis pathology?
Published online on September 29, 2016
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess whether scrotal ultrasound scan is necessary in patients with clinically suspected benign testis pathology.
Between January 2012 and December 2013 a total of 3297 men with a median age of 37 years (range 16–60 years) underwent a scrotal ultrasound scan performed by a mixture of radiographers and radiologists. Of these, 1378/3297 (42%) with a median age of 36 years (range 16–60 years) were included in our study; 1919 (58%) were excluded, as they were thought to have an infective, malignant or traumatic testis.
Twenty-six out of 1378 (1.9%) had a sinister scrotal ultrasound scan and were referred to the urology multidisciplinary team. Of these, 17/26 (65%) with a median age of 32 years (range 19–59 years) were still regarded as having a malignant pathology and underwent an orchidectomy. Histology revealed a malignant pathology in 14/17 (82%) with a median age of 32 years (range 23–52 years). Overall, 17/1378 (1.2%) had an unexpected suspicious scrotal ultrasound scan supported at the multidisciplinary team review, with 14/1378 (1%) having a confirmed malignant pathology.
Our large retrospective study has demonstrated that 1% of men with clinically benign testis lesion will actually have an underlying unsuspected malignant pathology. Therefore, scrotal ultrasound scan should be considered in all men presenting with a testis lesion.