MetaTOC stay on top of your field, easily

Validating indirect fire models with field experiments

, , , , , ,

The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology

Published online on

Abstract

Field experiments were used to evaluate three different indirect fire models: the cookie cutter and the Carleton damage functions and a simplified physical model for fragmenting ammunition. Data from three field tests, in which a total of 66 mortar bombs (120 mm high explosive) were fired in flat terrain, is used for validation.

The results imply that no universal parameters, that would fit the results, can be found for the damage function models while the physical model predicted the field test results consistently without parameter fitting.