Reply to "A Replication of 'Political Influence Behind the Veil of Peer Review' (Journal of Law and Economics 2009)"
Published online on September 29, 2015
Abstract
In this reply, I commented on Hannum’s (this issue) replication of Hegde and of Hegde and Mowery. I conclude that, in his eagerness to show us wrong, Hannum appears to have committed exactly the wrong that replication exercises are meant to right.