Rap as Threat? The Violent Translation of Music in American Law
Law, Culture and the Humanities
Published online on November 06, 2014
Abstract
In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jamal Knox and Rashee Beasley (2013), the defendants were charged with making "terroristic threats" after their rap song "F* the Police" appeared on YouTube. This unique case (similar only to U.S. v. Elonis of the same year) exposes significant issues within the law: ambiguity surrounding the law’s definitions of threat and the problematic assumption at court that rap as evidence is a literal text or confessional. It also, however, reveals a certain consistency in the court’s treatment of music: general dismissal. That mishandling of music, in this case, allowed for a rather drastic translation of "F* the Police" – a court-constituted violence credited to the defendants alone.