["Middle East Policy, Volume 33, Issue 3, Autumn (Fall) 2026. ", "\nAbstract\nRecent recognitions of the State of Palestine, such as by France in 2025, have revived the debate over the utility of such moves. Some observers argue that this is premature and ultimately meaningless given the ongoing Israeli occupation. This article contends to the contrary that although Palestine does not yet have territorial and political control, recognition can expand treaty participation, access to international legal forums, and regulatory differentiation between Israel and the occupied territories. Coupled with implementation and accountability measures, recognition can help make full territorial sovereignty possible. The study examines the international agreements and institutional changes that have occurred since the United Nations accepted Palestine as a nonmember observer state in 2012. It then analyzes Belgium's 2025 move to recognize Palestine, finding that the impact is enhanced when accompanied by regulatory, diplomatic, or enforcement‐based mechanisms. By advancing a typology separating symbolic recognition, recognition with conditions, and recognition with enforcement, the article offers a framework for assessing when such actions become consequential under conditions of contested sovereignty.\n"]