MetaTOC stay on top of your field, easily

Barriers to consulting for symptoms of possible colorectal cancer among rural patients in England: A cross‐sectional survey

, , , , , , , ,

The Journal of Rural Health

Published online on

Abstract

["The Journal of Rural Health, Volume 42, Issue 2, Spring 2026. ", "\nAbstract\n\nBackground\nRural cancer inequalities are well‐documented globally, but their causes remain unclear. Late diagnosis may impact rural cancer outcomes; however, little is known about rural patients’ beliefs and experiences of consulting for cancer symptoms.\n\n\nMethods\n3400 eligible patients from four primary care practices in rural England were invited to participate. Participants completed a survey about recent symptomatic experience and beliefs about accessing health care. Barriers to accessing primary care were grouped into three domains (individual level, primary care, contextual) and scored. ANOVAs (analysis of variance) were used to investigate variation in scores by fixed socio‐demographic characteristics.\n\n\nResults\n722 surveys were returned (response rate = 21%). Consultation for symptoms was significantly associated with deprivation and age. Participants in the least rural areas, or registered at larger practices, had significantly higher mean scores for barriers to help‐seeking across all three domains. Participants in the least deprived areas had the highest scores across all three domains. Women, younger participants, and those currently working had significantly higher scores for contextual barriers. The most commonly reported barriers to help‐seeking were work commitments, appointment availability, relationship with General Practitioners and road infrastructure.\n\n\nConclusions\nThis is one of the first studies to undertake a granular examination of help‐seeking behaviors and barriers for rural residents. We found no association between degree of rurality and likelihood of consultation. The higher reporting of help‐seeking barriers among people in the least remote areas, or registered at larger practices, challenges assumptions that the most remote patients face the greatest obstacles to consultation.\n\n"]