["Family Relations, Volume 75, Issue 2, Page 1020-1042, April 2026. ", "\nAbstract\n\nBackground\nRevenge cognitions and behaviors are common responses following intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, yet little is known about how survivors, particularly from religious minority communities, process these responses during recovery.\n\n\nObjective\nThis study investigated how Jewish women IPV survivors conceptualize and navigate revenge‐related responses in the aftermath of IPV.\n\n\nMethod\nUsing a descriptive phenomenological‐psychological approach, data were collected through in‐depth interviews and focus groups with 79 Jewish Canadian women (aged 24–64) who had experienced IPV.\n\n\nResults\nThematic analysis revealed three patterns: (a) First, “revenge—between thinking, planning, and acting,” capturing retaliatory cognitions; (b) second, “silence—the ultimate revenge,” demonstrating nonengagement as empowerment as a psychological coping strategy; and (c) third, “true winning has nothing to do with revenge,” highlighting transformation toward self‐focused recovery. Although revenge thoughts were acknowledged as inherent to early healing stages, findings showed these typically evolved toward constructive healing paths when supported by culturally informed approaches.\n\n\nConclusion\nFindings demonstrate that although revenge cognitions are common in early recovery from IPV, Jewish women survivors typically progress toward nonretaliatory coping strategies.\n\n\nImplications\nResults emphasize the importance of culturally informed therapeutic approaches that acknowledge and support this transformation process.\n\n"]