["The Australian Journal of Anthropology, EarlyView. ", "\nAbstract\nLiving funerals mark a radical reconfiguration of contemporary engagements with mortality, transforming death from an imposed ending into an actively authored narrative. This study examines the practice in Hong Kong's hybrid sociocultural landscape, where traditional Chinese death rituals collide with neoliberal selfhood and globalised memorialisation practices. Through an ethnographic analysis of a living funeral ceremony, centred on entrepreneur Ms D and involving 12 participants, we reveal how these rituals function as liminal narrative spaces, destabilising binaries between life/death, mourner/deceased, and past/future. Drawing on narrative identity theory and ritual studies, we argue that living funerals enact three transformative mechanisms: (1) narrative sovereignty, where participants reclaim agency over their life stories, challenging Confucian and Christian norms that cede death narratives to communal authority; (2) communal catharsis, wherein shared affect (laughter, tears, silence) generates what participants termed ‘grief that builds rather than buries’; and (3) liminal objects, repurposed funeral artefacts that serve as cultural palimpsests, erasing and rewriting traditional death ways. Ms D's ceremony, featuring anticipatory eulogies, inverted ritual roles, and a courtroom‐like confrontation with her past, exemplifies how these rituals address existential anxieties while fostering closure and unresolved relational repair. Yet these innovations provoke narrative friction. The celebratory ethos of living funerals clashes with Cantonese mourning's structured solemnity, exposing generational rifts and cultural symptoms: practices that lay bare societal struggles to reconcile filial duty with neoliberal self‐reinvention. Older participants reported feeling ‘ritual homelessness’, while younger attendees embraced the DIY ethos as existential democracy, a collaborative reimagining of life's final chapter. Ultimately, living funerals do not reject tradition but stretch its forms, rendering visible what all mortuary rituals are: not conclusions, but acts of narrative courage.\n"]